![]() |
| Excerpt of Child's Letter to Mayor Lindsay - Courtesy NYC Municipal Archives |
About:
Established in 1982 at LaGuardia Community College/ CUNY with a mission to collect, preserve, and make available primary materials documenting the social and political history of New York City. We hold nearly 5,000 cubic feet of archival records and 3,200 reels of microfilm with almost 100,000 photographs and 2,000,000 documents available on our website.
Showing posts with label Queens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Queens. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
Letters to Mayor Lindsay: Children Respond to the 1966 New York City Transit Strike
Children from all over New York City, and around the country
wrote to Mayor Lindsay during his first year in office. The new mayor was, after all, a highly
visible man, a strikingly tall and energetic figure. Many simply asked for a picture or
autograph. But more than any other
subject, children wrote to the mayor about the 12 day transit strike, the worst
in the city’s history. Many witnessed it
in their daily lives. Others saw it on
television. Some talked about it in
classrooms as far away as Massachusetts.
Here is a selection of their letters.
On January 1, 1966, as John V. Lindsay took the oath of
office as New York City’s 103rd mayor, transit workers all over the
city, led by Mike Quill, walked off the job.
Our video about the 1966 transit strike uses
contemporary newsreel footage to explore the strike through the experience of
adults: the mayor and commuters walking to work; long lines; and crowded
highways. Children’s letters to the
mayor offer a different perspective.
Labels:
1966,
Bronx,
children,
Connecticut,
Flushing,
John V. Lindsay,
Long Island,
Main Street,
mass transit,
Massachusetts,
Mayor Lindsay,
Mike Quill,
New York City,
Queens,
Transit Strike
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
Pope Francis' Visit in Historical Context
It is truly remarkable
that Pope Francis will speak before Congress this week. Democrats and Republicans alike may hope that
the pontiff supports their positions on topics ranging from the environment to
Planned Parenthood, but no one fears a papal conspiracy to control America.
As recently as Pope John Paul II’s visit to the United States in 1979, newscasters focused their analysis on the separation of church and state, and concerns about papal influence over the White House. Even as the newscaster in this video suggests that concern over these issues were in the past, the fact that they are the sole content of his report suggests otherwise. John Paul II himself was sensitive to the political implications of his visit. We have in our collection a 1979 confidential internal State Department memo stating that “The Pope stressed…that his visit would be pastoral and not political.” “If the Pope does not come this year, he will not visit until after 1980, since he wishes to be totally uninvolved in our election process.”
As recently as Pope John Paul II’s visit to the United States in 1979, newscasters focused their analysis on the separation of church and state, and concerns about papal influence over the White House. Even as the newscaster in this video suggests that concern over these issues were in the past, the fact that they are the sole content of his report suggests otherwise. John Paul II himself was sensitive to the political implications of his visit. We have in our collection a 1979 confidential internal State Department memo stating that “The Pope stressed…that his visit would be pastoral and not political.” “If the Pope does not come this year, he will not visit until after 1980, since he wishes to be totally uninvolved in our election process.”
For most of
American history, such fears of papal influence were palpable and often at the
center of politics. Samuel F. B. Morse
(the inventor of the telegraph) wrote in 1835, “…emigrant Catholics…confine
themselves simply and wholly to increasing the number of their sect, and the
influence of the Pope in this country. The
American Party (a.k.a. the Know-Nothings) swept to election victories in the 1850s
on the fear of Catholic immigrants and papal control.
It wasn’t
until 1928 that any major party even considered a Catholic presidential
candidate. Alfred E. Smith, a popular
and progressive governor of New York lost to Herbert Hoover, in large part
because he was a Catholic. Many believed
the rumor that he had wired the pope after losing the election with the message,
“Unpack!”
In 1960, John
F. Kennedy’s Catholicism was a big issue in the presidential campaign. Pope John XXIII reportedly joked, “do not
expect me to run a country with a language as difficult as yours,” when he
heard Kennedy might win. Many Americans sincerely
feared that Kennedy would take orders from the pope, undermining American
sovereignty. To establish his
independence from the Vatican, Kennedy made it a point to say, “I did not, would
not, nor have I accepted that kind of dictation.” He went on to establish definitively
that allowing the pope to dictate American policy would be grounds for
impeachment of any president.
No pope even
visited the United States until 1965. That
year, President Johnson met with Pope Paul VI at a hotel room in New York,
notably avoiding a visit to the White House.
Magazine inserts and commemorative books, like the selected pages from this one, were titled “Fourteen Hours,”
highlighting the brevity of the pope’s visit.
And Paul VI’s main reason for coming to the United States in 1965 was to
address the United Nations, a clearly international institution. Had the pope gone to Washington at all on
that historic visit, he would have certainly been accused of meddling in
American politics.
It is truly remarkable
that Pope Francis will speak before Congress this week. It will be interesting to hear this first
papal speech before the American government, ever.
View some images from our collection of earlier
papal visits to New York.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
